Liberal Fascism

liberal-fascism.jpg

What is fascism?

Surprisingly, there is no shared definitive answer despite numerous books written on the subject. The word is mostly parroted by those who have the least idea of its meaning, let alone its history. Its ironic to hear it chidingly used by leaders such as Hugo Chavez who embody it’s meaning perhaps more so than George W Bush, its current poster boy.

Even George Orwell stated that fascism has no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable”. Which is why Jonah Goldberg, the author of the best-seller LIBERAL FASCISM sums up his own definition after an exhaustive research.

“Fascism is a religion of the state. It assumes the organic unity of the body politic and longs for a national leader attuned to the will of the people. It is totalitarian in that it views everything as political and holds that any action by the state is justified to achieve the common good.” Goldberg goes on to conclude “I will argue that contemporary American liberalism embodies all of these aspects of fascism”.

Goldberg’s arguments are eye-opening and on point. The biggest misconception being fascism is a phenomenon of the right as most people argue and believe it to be the polar opposite of communism. With political pundits such as Bill Maher stating fascism is “when corporations become the government”, it’s interesting to note how its originator, Benito Mussolini, was not only a devout socialist, but declared socialism was “bred into my very bones.”

The difference between Mussolini’s exploitation of socialism as opposed to Lenin’s was he believed it to be an “Italian” struggle, not a class struggle. He was seeking to rebuild a modern day Roman Empire, and understood that class-consciousness wasn’t as powerful as the call of the nation to achieve this goal.

It’s impossible for anyone under the age of 70 to remember when Mussolini was revered in the US. Members of Franklin Roosevelt’s Brain Trust such as Rexford Tugwell said of Italian Fascism “It’s the cleanest, neatest most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I’ve ever seen. It makes me envious.” Much less do people want to remember the internment camps under FDR where hundreds of thousands of Japanese, German and Italian Americans were forced to relocate during WW II under the guise of the “common good”.

And if one fast forwards to our current presidential primaries and listens to candidates alluding to FDR and their “progressive” versions of a new New Deal, it’s eerie to think how fascism may rear its ugly head. Though this time in the form of “smiley-face” fascism as the book’s cover alludes to. “If there is ever a fascist take over in America, it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors” writes Goldberg. “but with lawyers and social workers saying ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

2 comments for “Liberal Fascism

  1. kevin jacobs
    February 23, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Fascism can be defined. Fascism is National Socialism. it’s a socialist structure that benefits a small number of people at the cost of a large number of people. Hugo Chavez’s socialism is not of that variety above mentioned. His socialism has broadened the benefit for more citizens of venezuela. The bail out of the banking system is an example of Fascism. it was a socialized give-out program that sustained an overbloated credit system. I agree that both liberals and conservatives are fascists in this country. When it comes down to it, the poor need power, not hand outs

Comments are closed.